《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 设计应用 > 数字经济时代下数据权责平衡的法律因应与规制进路
数字经济时代下数据权责平衡的法律因应与规制进路
网络安全与数据治理
许茂恒1,付颜2,李欣洋3,叶永青4
1.武汉大学法学院;2.南京江北新区人民法院; 3.温州市人民检察院;4.杭州市中级人民法院
摘要: 数据作为数字经济时代的核心生产要素,是培育新质生产力的重要驱动力。当前,数据流通规则缺失、安全风险外溢及竞争失序等问题,深刻揭示了数据主体间权责失衡的矛盾。面对新质生产力发展的客观要求,多元主体间的利益博弈日益显现。为此,必须完善法律顶层设计,以制度创新驱动技术创新,构建权责平衡的数据治理体系。鉴于此,首先,应设立数据财产权,通过赋权手段实现界权目的;其次,尊重个人数据价值,重视禀赋效应并营造可信的数据利用环境;再次,推行数据处理结果审查机制,以消解技术应用带来的伦理风险;最后,优化竞争政策,实施动态与包容性监管,推动实现权责对等与红利共享的数据发展目标。
中圖分類號:D922.17文獻標(biāo)志碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2026.01.010
中文引用格式:許茂恒,付顏,李欣洋,等. 數(shù)字經(jīng)濟時代下數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)責(zé)平衡的法律因應(yīng)與規(guī)制進路[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2026,45(1):64-71.
英文引用格式:Xu Maoheng, Fu Yan,Li Xinyang, et al. Legal response and regulatory approach of data right and responsibility balance in the era of digital economy[J].Cyber Security and Data Governance,2026,45(1):64-71.
Legal response and regulatory approach of data right and responsibility balance in the era of digital economy
Xu Maoheng1, Fu Yan2,Li Xinyang3,Ye Yongqing4
1. School of Law, Wuhan University;2. Nanjing Jiangbei New Area People′s Court; 3. Wenzhou People′s Procuratorate;4. Hangzhou Intermediate People′s Court,
Abstract: As a core factor of production in the era of the digital economy, data serves as a crucial driving force for cultivating new quality productive forces. Currently, issues such as the absence of data circulation rules, the spillover of security risks, and disorderly competition have profoundly exposed the conflict of imbalanced rights and responsibilities among data stakeholders. In light of the objective requirements for the development of new quality productive forces, the interest dynamics among diverse stakeholders are increasingly evident. To address this, it is essential to refine the toplevel legal design, drive technological innovation through institutional innovation, and establish a data governance system that balances rights and responsibilities. In this regard, the following steps should be taken: first, data property rights should be established, achieving the goal of defining rights through empowerment; second, the value of personal data should be respected, with attention given to the endowment effect and the creation of a trustworthy environment for data utilization; third, a review mechanism for data processing outcomes should be implemented to mitigate the ethical risks arising from technological applications; and finally, competition policies should be optimized through dynamic and inclusive regulation to promote the goals of equitable rights and responsibilities and shared benefits in data development.
Key words : new quality productive forces; balance of right and responsibility; balance of interests; data; information

引言

我國已進入數(shù)字經(jīng)濟時代,數(shù)據(jù)作為核心生產(chǎn)要素價值凸顯。2022年中共中央、國務(wù)院發(fā)布的《關(guān)于構(gòu)建數(shù)據(jù)基礎(chǔ)制度更好發(fā)揮數(shù)據(jù)要素作用的意見》強調(diào),要從數(shù)據(jù)賦權(quán)、流通交易、利益分配及安全合規(guī)四方面構(gòu)建數(shù)據(jù)制度體系,推動數(shù)字經(jīng)濟發(fā)展。2023年9月習(xí)近平總書記首次提出“新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)力”概念,以新的生產(chǎn)力理論來指導(dǎo)社會高質(zhì)量發(fā)展[1]。數(shù)據(jù)作為新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)要素,對數(shù)字經(jīng)濟發(fā)展至關(guān)重要。新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)力理念下,我國正由數(shù)據(jù)保護轉(zhuǎn)向數(shù)據(jù)流通利用。然而,數(shù)據(jù)產(chǎn)權(quán)界定的模糊性,不僅抑制了數(shù)據(jù)要素的有效流通,更固化了數(shù)據(jù)孤島現(xiàn)象。與此同時,在數(shù)據(jù)開發(fā)利用的全鏈條中,個人數(shù)據(jù)保護也面臨著日益嚴(yán)峻的安全挑戰(zhàn)。在市場競爭格局中,企業(yè)持有的商業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)并非憑空產(chǎn)生,其價值根植于對海量個人信息的收集、加工與分析。正是個人信息所蘊含的巨大商業(yè)價值,驅(qū)動企業(yè)投入資源進行深度挖掘,以洞察市場趨勢、描繪用戶畫像。這一過程不僅助力企業(yè)優(yōu)化運營決策、迭代產(chǎn)品服務(wù),最終也轉(zhuǎn)化為其核心市場競爭力[2]。盡管企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的價值根植于海量的個人信息,但在實踐中,價值的創(chuàng)造者與獲益者卻嚴(yán)重錯位。一方面,由于信息不對稱和懸殊的談判地位,個人用戶往往在未獲得合理對價的情況下,被迫讓渡其數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)利,造成了價值分配源頭上的失衡;另一方面,這種失衡進一步傳導(dǎo)至市場競爭層面:數(shù)據(jù)資源向頭部平臺高度集中后,形成了堅固的競爭壁壘。部分市場主導(dǎo)者濫用其數(shù)據(jù)優(yōu)勢,通過拒絕交易或附加不合理條件等方式實施數(shù)據(jù)封鎖,嚴(yán)重抑制了市場創(chuàng)新與公平競爭。在此背景下,數(shù)據(jù)作為新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)力核心要素的潛能被極大束縛。協(xié)調(diào)多元主體利益、構(gòu)建公平高效的數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)益體系,是數(shù)字時代賦予法律制度的時代使命。立足于權(quán)責(zé)平衡視角,多維度探索法律回應(yīng)策略,既是解決當(dāng)前數(shù)據(jù)流轉(zhuǎn)困局的現(xiàn)實訴求,亦是擘畫未來數(shù)字文明制度藍圖的必由之路。


本文詳細內(nèi)容請下載:

http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000006935


作者信息:

許茂恒1,付顏2,李欣洋3,葉永青4

(1.武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院,湖北武漢430072;

2.南京江北新區(qū)人民法院,江蘇南京210000;

3.溫州市人民檢察院,浙江溫州325000;

4.杭州市中級人民法院,浙江杭州310000)

2.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。