《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁(yè) > 其他 > 设计应用 > 数字经济时代下数据权责平衡的法律因应与规制进路
数字经济时代下数据权责平衡的法律因应与规制进路
网络安全与数据治理
许茂恒1,付颜2,李欣洋3,叶永青4
1.武汉大学法学院;2.南京江北新区人民法院; 3.温州市人民检察院;4.杭州市中级人民法院
摘要: 数据作为数字经济时代的核心生产要素,是培育新质生产力的重要驱动力。当前,数据流通规则缺失、安全风险外溢及竞争失序等问题,深刻揭示了数据主体间权责失衡的矛盾。面对新质生产力发展的客观要求,多元主体间的利益博弈日益显现。为此,必须完善法律顶层设计,以制度创新驱动技术创新,构建权责平衡的数据治理体系。鉴于此,首先,应设立数据财产权,通过赋权手段实现界权目的;其次,尊重个人数据价值,重视禀赋效应并营造可信的数据利用环境;再次,推行数据处理结果审查机制,以消解技术应用带来的伦理风险;最后,优化竞争政策,实施动态与包容性监管,推动实现权责对等与红利共享的数据发展目标。
中圖分類號(hào):D922.17文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2026.01.010
中文引用格式:許茂恒,付顏,李欣洋,等. 數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代下數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)責(zé)平衡的法律因應(yīng)與規(guī)制進(jìn)路[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2026,45(1):64-71.
英文引用格式:Xu Maoheng, Fu Yan,Li Xinyang, et al. Legal response and regulatory approach of data right and responsibility balance in the era of digital economy[J].Cyber Security and Data Governance,2026,45(1):64-71.
Legal response and regulatory approach of data right and responsibility balance in the era of digital economy
Xu Maoheng1, Fu Yan2,Li Xinyang3,Ye Yongqing4
1. School of Law, Wuhan University;2. Nanjing Jiangbei New Area People′s Court; 3. Wenzhou People′s Procuratorate;4. Hangzhou Intermediate People′s Court,
Abstract: As a core factor of production in the era of the digital economy, data serves as a crucial driving force for cultivating new quality productive forces. Currently, issues such as the absence of data circulation rules, the spillover of security risks, and disorderly competition have profoundly exposed the conflict of imbalanced rights and responsibilities among data stakeholders. In light of the objective requirements for the development of new quality productive forces, the interest dynamics among diverse stakeholders are increasingly evident. To address this, it is essential to refine the toplevel legal design, drive technological innovation through institutional innovation, and establish a data governance system that balances rights and responsibilities. In this regard, the following steps should be taken: first, data property rights should be established, achieving the goal of defining rights through empowerment; second, the value of personal data should be respected, with attention given to the endowment effect and the creation of a trustworthy environment for data utilization; third, a review mechanism for data processing outcomes should be implemented to mitigate the ethical risks arising from technological applications; and finally, competition policies should be optimized through dynamic and inclusive regulation to promote the goals of equitable rights and responsibilities and shared benefits in data development.
Key words : new quality productive forces; balance of right and responsibility; balance of interests; data; information

引言

我國(guó)已進(jìn)入數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,數(shù)據(jù)作為核心生產(chǎn)要素價(jià)值凸顯。2022年中共中央、國(guó)務(wù)院發(fā)布的《關(guān)于構(gòu)建數(shù)據(jù)基礎(chǔ)制度更好發(fā)揮數(shù)據(jù)要素作用的意見》強(qiáng)調(diào),要從數(shù)據(jù)賦權(quán)、流通交易、利益分配及安全合規(guī)四方面構(gòu)建數(shù)據(jù)制度體系,推動(dòng)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。2023年9月習(xí)近平總書記首次提出“新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)力”概念,以新的生產(chǎn)力理論來(lái)指導(dǎo)社會(huì)高質(zhì)量發(fā)展[1]。數(shù)據(jù)作為新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)要素,對(duì)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展至關(guān)重要。新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)力理念下,我國(guó)正由數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)轉(zhuǎn)向數(shù)據(jù)流通利用。然而,數(shù)據(jù)產(chǎn)權(quán)界定的模糊性,不僅抑制了數(shù)據(jù)要素的有效流通,更固化了數(shù)據(jù)孤島現(xiàn)象。與此同時(shí),在數(shù)據(jù)開發(fā)利用的全鏈條中,個(gè)人數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)也面臨著日益嚴(yán)峻的安全挑戰(zhàn)。在市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)格局中,企業(yè)持有的商業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)并非憑空產(chǎn)生,其價(jià)值根植于對(duì)海量個(gè)人信息的收集、加工與分析。正是個(gè)人信息所蘊(yùn)含的巨大商業(yè)價(jià)值,驅(qū)動(dòng)企業(yè)投入資源進(jìn)行深度挖掘,以洞察市場(chǎng)趨勢(shì)、描繪用戶畫像。這一過(guò)程不僅助力企業(yè)優(yōu)化運(yùn)營(yíng)決策、迭代產(chǎn)品服務(wù),最終也轉(zhuǎn)化為其核心市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力[2]。盡管企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的價(jià)值根植于海量的個(gè)人信息,但在實(shí)踐中,價(jià)值的創(chuàng)造者與獲益者卻嚴(yán)重錯(cuò)位。一方面,由于信息不對(duì)稱和懸殊的談判地位,個(gè)人用戶往往在未獲得合理對(duì)價(jià)的情況下,被迫讓渡其數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)利,造成了價(jià)值分配源頭上的失衡;另一方面,這種失衡進(jìn)一步傳導(dǎo)至市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)層面:數(shù)據(jù)資源向頭部平臺(tái)高度集中后,形成了堅(jiān)固的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)壁壘。部分市場(chǎng)主導(dǎo)者濫用其數(shù)據(jù)優(yōu)勢(shì),通過(guò)拒絕交易或附加不合理?xiàng)l件等方式實(shí)施數(shù)據(jù)封鎖,嚴(yán)重抑制了市場(chǎng)創(chuàng)新與公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。在此背景下,數(shù)據(jù)作為新質(zhì)生產(chǎn)力核心要素的潛能被極大束縛。協(xié)調(diào)多元主體利益、構(gòu)建公平高效的數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)益體系,是數(shù)字時(shí)代賦予法律制度的時(shí)代使命。立足于權(quán)責(zé)平衡視角,多維度探索法律回應(yīng)策略,既是解決當(dāng)前數(shù)據(jù)流轉(zhuǎn)困局的現(xiàn)實(shí)訴求,亦是擘畫未來(lái)數(shù)字文明制度藍(lán)圖的必由之路。


本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:

http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000006935


作者信息:

許茂恒1,付顏2,李欣洋3,葉永青4

(1.武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院,湖北武漢430072;

2.南京江北新區(qū)人民法院,江蘇南京210000;

3.溫州市人民檢察院,浙江溫州325000;

4.杭州市中級(jí)人民法院,浙江杭州310000)

2.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。