數(shù)據(jù)競爭行為的類型化重構(gòu)及其規(guī)制因應(yīng)
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
李佐
中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)法學(xué)院
摘要: 面對數(shù)據(jù)市場的競爭失序,競爭法律欲實現(xiàn)辨證施治,需以數(shù)據(jù)競爭行為的類型化歸納為前提。傳統(tǒng)“不正當(dāng)競爭與壟斷”的二分法既難以適應(yīng)數(shù)據(jù)競爭行為的復(fù)雜性,也不足以回應(yīng)數(shù)據(jù)治理的現(xiàn)實需要。基于數(shù)據(jù)生產(chǎn)流程,可將數(shù)據(jù)競爭行為劃分為獲取階段的競爭行為與使用階段的競爭行為兩類。前者包括獲取經(jīng)營者數(shù)據(jù)、用戶數(shù)據(jù)及拒絕數(shù)據(jù)獲取;后者涵蓋數(shù)據(jù)排他性使用、數(shù)據(jù)驅(qū)動型自我優(yōu)待和大數(shù)據(jù)殺熟。據(jù)此,應(yīng)確立包容審慎的規(guī)制理念,并在獲取階段強(qiáng)調(diào)數(shù)據(jù)流通,以包容促發(fā)展;在使用階段注重權(quán)益保護(hù),以審慎防風(fēng)險。
中圖分類號:D922.29文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2025.12.010引用格式:李佐. 數(shù)據(jù)競爭行為的類型化重構(gòu)及其規(guī)制因應(yīng)[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2025,44(12):69-74,82.
The typological reconstruction of data competition behaviors and the regulatory responses
Li Zuo
School of Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Abstract: Confronting the disorder in the data market, competition law must establish a typology of data competition behaviors as a prerequisite for implementing differentiated and targeted governance. The traditional dichotomy of "unfair competition and monopoly" is illsuited to the complexity of data competition behaviors and fails to meet the practical needs of data governance. Based on the data production process, data competition behaviors can be categorized into two stages: acquisition and use. The acquisition stage includes obtaining data from businesses, collecting user data, and refusing data access. The use stage encompasses exclusive data use, datadriven selfpreferencing, and algorithmic price discrimination. Accordingly, a regulatory philosophy of tolerance and prudence should be established: emphasizing data circulation during the acquisition stage to foster development through tolerance, and prioritizing rights protection during the use stage to mitigate risks through prudence.
Key words : data competition behavior; commercial data terms; AntiUnfair Competition Law; AntiMonopoly Law
引言
當(dāng)前,我國數(shù)據(jù)要素市場競爭失序現(xiàn)象突出,主要表現(xiàn)為非法獲取和使用數(shù)據(jù)、拒絕數(shù)據(jù)開放、大數(shù)據(jù)殺熟、數(shù)據(jù)驅(qū)動型自我優(yōu)待等行為。在數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)屬尚未明確、專門立法缺失的背景下,相關(guān)爭議多訴諸競爭法解決。然而,傳統(tǒng)競爭法發(fā)源于工業(yè)社會,面對數(shù)據(jù)競爭的新形態(tài)已顯滯后,亟待更新規(guī)則。在此過程中,類型化梳理是構(gòu)建有效規(guī)制體系的理論前提[1]。當(dāng)前學(xué)界多聚焦于具體行為的個案分析,缺乏系統(tǒng)性歸類;立法實踐則仍沿用“不正當(dāng)競爭—壟斷”的二分框架,難以適應(yīng)數(shù)據(jù)行為的復(fù)雜性。為此,本文嘗試提出“獲取—使用”二分的數(shù)據(jù)競爭類型化方案,將獲取階段行為細(xì)分為獲取經(jīng)營者數(shù)據(jù)、獲取用戶數(shù)據(jù)與拒絕數(shù)據(jù)獲?。皇褂秒A段行為則涵蓋數(shù)據(jù)排他性使用、自我優(yōu)待與大數(shù)據(jù)殺熟,并據(jù)此提出階段性、差異化的規(guī)制思路,以期為我國數(shù)據(jù)競爭規(guī)則的體系化構(gòu)建提供參考。
本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請下載:
http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000006892
作者信息:
李佐
(中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)法學(xué)院,湖北武漢430073)

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。
