《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 設(shè)計應(yīng)用 > 數(shù)字主權(quán)視角下歐盟個人數(shù)據(jù)跨境流動規(guī)制之惑
數(shù)字主權(quán)視角下歐盟個人數(shù)據(jù)跨境流動規(guī)制之惑
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
蔡亞岑
吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院
摘要: 歐盟以數(shù)字主權(quán)為指導(dǎo),通過完善GDPR內(nèi)部機(jī)制和借助FTA推廣其個人數(shù)據(jù)跨境規(guī)則,并拓寬隱私例外條款以增強(qiáng)規(guī)則效力。然而,其規(guī)制形成了“軟”數(shù)據(jù)本地化,反而不利于維護(hù)數(shù)字主權(quán)。問題的根源在于歐盟數(shù)字主權(quán)目標(biāo)的雙重性——既保護(hù)公民隱私,又促進(jìn)數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,這兩者存在內(nèi)在沖突。同時,歐盟采取的相對主義主權(quán)適用模式,與多數(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)體的數(shù)字主權(quán)利益不符,易引發(fā)抵制,進(jìn)一步損害其主權(quán)目標(biāo)。鑒于此,我國首先應(yīng)當(dāng)完善我國的數(shù)字主權(quán)理念,其次基于我國數(shù)字主權(quán)利益訴求進(jìn)一步完善我國的個人數(shù)據(jù)跨境流動規(guī)則。在國際層面,可調(diào)整援引例外規(guī)則的思路,適當(dāng)借鑒歐盟在FTA中將主權(quán)訴求“權(quán)利化”的做法。
中圖分類號:D996文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2025.10.013
引用格式:蔡亞岑. 數(shù)字主權(quán)視角下歐盟個人數(shù)據(jù)跨境流動規(guī)制之惑[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2025,44(10):80-86.
The confusion of EU regulations on crossborder flow of personal data from the perspective of digital sovereignty
Cai Yacen
Law School, Jilin University
Abstract: Guided by digital sovereignty, the European Union has improved the internal mechanism of GDPR and promoted its crossborder rules for personal data through FTA, and expanded privacy exception clauses to enhance the effectiveness of the rules. However, its regulation has led to the localization of "soft" data, which is not conducive to maintaining digital sovereignty. The root of the problem lies in the dual nature of the EU′s digital sovereignty goals—protecting citizens′ privacy while promoting the development of the digital economy, which are inherently conflicting. At the same time, the relativist sovereignty application model adopted by the EU is inconsistent with the digital sovereignty interests of most economies, which can easily trigger resistance and further undermine its sovereignty goals. In view of this, China should firstly improve its concept of digital sovereignty, and secondly, based on the interests of China′s digital sovereignty, improve the interpretation of China′s rules for the cross-border flow of personal data. At the international level, the approach of invoking exception rules can be adjusted, and the EU′s practice of "rights based" sovereignty claims in FTAs can be appropriately drawn on.
Key words : digital sovereignty; cross border flow of personal data; GDPR;data localization

引言

數(shù)據(jù)流動超越實體疆域,導(dǎo)致管轄與領(lǐng)土分離。如何在維護(hù)本國數(shù)據(jù)利益的同時遏制他國數(shù)據(jù)管轄權(quán)擴(kuò)張,成為跨境數(shù)據(jù)治理核心挑戰(zhàn)。歐盟是該領(lǐng)域重要且獨特的存在。其2018年頒布的《通用數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)條例》(General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR),以保護(hù)歐盟視為基本權(quán)利的“個人數(shù)據(jù)安全”為核心,為個人數(shù)據(jù)跨境流動設(shè)定了高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)保護(hù)。此后,歐盟進(jìn)一步提出“數(shù)字主權(quán)”概念,旨在回應(yīng)其數(shù)字發(fā)展落后于中美、市場受制于美企的現(xiàn)狀,并追求兩大目標(biāo):保護(hù)公民數(shù)據(jù)隱私權(quán)和發(fā)展自身數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)?;诖?,歐盟對內(nèi)完善GDPR跨境機(jī)制,對外通過自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定(Free Trade Agreement, FTA)推廣其規(guī)則并擴(kuò)張隱私例外,以增強(qiáng)其治理規(guī)則的合法性與效力。

實踐中,GDPR規(guī)則已構(gòu)成事實上的“軟”數(shù)據(jù)本地化,其FTA則在國際層面為此提供了合法性支撐。然而,“軟”數(shù)據(jù)本地化措施本身與歐盟數(shù)字主權(quán)的深層訴求(如發(fā)展數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì))存在潛在沖突。那么,“軟”數(shù)據(jù)本地化措施到底對歐盟數(shù)字主權(quán)有哪些不利影響?根源何在?能否從主權(quán)層面解釋?厘清此問題對我國極具借鑒意義。當(dāng)前,我國個人數(shù)據(jù)跨境流動規(guī)則尚不足以有效維護(hù)數(shù)字時代的國家利益。現(xiàn)有研究多聚焦數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)、規(guī)則本身、大國博弈或國際規(guī)制銜接,缺乏從數(shù)字時代國家主權(quán)視角系統(tǒng)性探討我國規(guī)則的構(gòu)建。因此,深入分析歐盟如何立足數(shù)字主權(quán)完善其跨境規(guī)則,可為我國優(yōu)化數(shù)據(jù)出境治理提供重要參考。


本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請下載:

http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000006831


作者信息:

蔡亞岑

(吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院,吉林長春130000)


subscribe.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。