《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁(yè) > 人工智能 > 設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)用 > 論人工智能在刑事司法決策中的應(yīng)用
論人工智能在刑事司法決策中的應(yīng)用
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理 8期
李容佳
(中國(guó)政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院,北京100088)
摘要: 人工智能在刑事司法領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用方興未艾,世界各國(guó)廣泛開(kāi)發(fā)人工智能產(chǎn)品,以期提高司法效率,提升司法決策的公平性。然而,人工智能尚處于初級(jí)階段,存在決策偏見(jiàn)、算法黑箱等技術(shù)缺陷,并不能做到完全價(jià)值中立;人工智能的應(yīng)用也對(duì)傳統(tǒng)司法原則和理論造成了沖擊,一定程度上威脅到了人權(quán)保護(hù)。所以,不能盲目夸大人工智能對(duì)于司法決策的作用。針對(duì)人工智能技術(shù)的缺陷,提出要在人工智能產(chǎn)品開(kāi)發(fā)的各個(gè)階段減少?zèng)Q策偏見(jiàn),推進(jìn)相關(guān)認(rèn)證標(biāo)準(zhǔn);對(duì)于人工智能的應(yīng)用問(wèn)題,首先要明確人工智能只能輔助決策而不能替代決策,其次應(yīng)加強(qiáng)人類(lèi)的責(zé)任和監(jiān)管,保障決策的公平性。同時(shí),應(yīng)加強(qiáng)辯方的數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)利,以實(shí)現(xiàn)技術(shù)司法模式下的控辯平衡。
中圖分類(lèi)號(hào):D915.3
文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.08.004
引用格式:李容佳.論人工智能在刑事司法決策中的應(yīng)用[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2023,42(8):21-27.
On artificial intelligenceassisted criminal justice decisionmaking
Li Rongjia
(School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088,China)
Abstract: The application of artificial intelligence in the field of criminal justice is on the rise, and countries around the world have widely developed artificial intelligence products in order to improve judicial efficiency and enhance the fairness of judicial decisionmaking. However, artificial intelligence is still in its initial stage, with technical defects such as decisionmaking bias and algorithm black box, and cannot achieve complete value neutrality. The application of artificial intelligence also has an impact on traditional judicial principles and theories, threatening human rights protection to a certain extent. Therefore, the role of artificial intelligence in judicial decisionmaking should not be blindly exaggerated. In view of the defects of artificial intelligence technology, this paper proposes to reduce decisionmaking bias and promote relevant certification standards in each cycle of AI development. For the application of artificial intelligence, it must be clear that artificial intelligence can only assist decisionmaking rather than replace decisionmaking. Secondly, human responsibility and supervision should be strengthened to ensure the fairness of decisionmaking. At the same time, the data rights of the defense should be strengthened to achieve the balance of prosecution and defense under the technical justice model.
Key words : artificial intelligence; judicial decisionmaking; human rights protection; balance of prosecution and defense;data rights

0    引言

為了更有效地打擊犯罪,提高司法效率,人工智能正被廣泛應(yīng)用于刑事司法中,縱觀世界各國(guó),在預(yù)測(cè)性警務(wù)、大數(shù)據(jù)偵查、審前羈押與保釋評(píng)估、證據(jù)審查判斷、司法文書(shū)生成、輔助量刑以及假釋等領(lǐng)域,人工智能都在發(fā)揮或多或少的作用。隨著我國(guó)《新一代人工智能發(fā)展規(guī)劃》《關(guān)于規(guī)范和加強(qiáng)人工智能司法應(yīng)用的意見(jiàn)》《關(guān)于加快建設(shè)智慧法院的意見(jiàn)》等文件的出臺(tái),各地司法機(jī)關(guān)也積極探索人工智能建設(shè), 上海“206”刑事辦案輔助系統(tǒng)、浙江“移動(dòng)微法院”建設(shè)以及杭州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院智審斷案等人工智能介入司法決策的應(yīng)用屢見(jiàn)不鮮。

人工智能的特性意味著它在執(zhí)行某些任務(wù)上遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)優(yōu)于人類(lèi),所以在刑事司法系統(tǒng)中使用人工智能會(huì)極大提高司法效率,優(yōu)化訴訟流程,但如果沒(méi)有合理的規(guī)范和適當(dāng)?shù)谋O(jiān)管,人工智能的使用也可能與刑事訴訟法理論相沖突,對(duì)人權(quán)保護(hù)產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)重的威脅。本文擬分析人工智能產(chǎn)品在刑事司法中應(yīng)用的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和隱患,論證其對(duì)于司法決策的輔助作用,并提出進(jìn)一步完善的措施。



本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000005462




作者信息:

 李容佳 (中國(guó)政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院,北京100088)

微信圖片_20210517164139.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。