《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 设计应用 > 数字经济下平台数据垄断合规的理据与路径
数字经济下平台数据垄断合规的理据与路径
网络安全与数据治理
陈镜霖
西南民族大学法学院
摘要: 数据要素的非竞争性、非排他性因平台垄断意图逐渐异化,并诱发算法共谋、大数据杀熟、平台扼杀式并购等反竞争行为。基于维护数据市场交易秩序的现实需要、竞争倡导理论的法理支撑以及域外数据合规监管的经验参考,平台数据垄断合规具有适用的可行性与必要性。然而,平台数据垄断合规往往因顶层规范缺失、规则模糊以及监管机制弱化等无法实现预期效果。对此,应细化“数据反垄断合规指南”的设计逻辑指引合规,区分不同类型数据权属以明确数据流通规则,依据数据流通的不同环节形塑数据竞争合规评价标准,衔接事前监管与事后监管理念促进监管理念革新,并依托人工智能算法技术赋能监管方式转型。
中圖分類號(hào):D922.294;D922.1文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.07.010
引用格式:陳鏡霖.數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)下平臺(tái)數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)的理據(jù)與路徑[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2024,43(7):61-68.
The rationale and path of platform data monopoly compliance under the digital economy
Chen Jinglin
Law School, Southwest Minzu University
Abstract: The noncompetitive and non-exclusive nature of data elements is gradually alienated by the platform′s monopoly intention, and induces anti-competitive behaviours such as algorithmic conspiracy, big data kills maturity, and platform strangulation mergers and acquisitions. Based on the practical need to maintain the order of data market transactions, the jurisprudential support of competition advocacy theory, and the empirical reference of extraterritorial data compliance regulation, the platform data monopoly compliance has the feasibility and necessity of application. However, data monopoly compliance often fails to achieve the expected results due to the lack of top-level norms, vague rules and weak regulatory mechanisms. In this regard, the design logic of the Data Antitrust Compliance Guidelines should be refined to guide compliance, differentiate the ownership of different types of data in order to clarify the rules of data circulation, shape the evaluation criteria of data competition compliance based on different aspects of data circulation, connect the concepts of ex ante and ex post regulation to promote the innovation of regulatory concepts, and rely on the algorithmic technology of AI to empower the transformation of regulatory methods.
Key words : digital economy; platform data; monopoly compliance; data circulation; data ownership

引言

數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,數(shù)據(jù)已成為全球競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的關(guān)鍵要素?!稊?shù)字中國發(fā)展報(bào)告(2022)》顯示,2022年我國數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模已超過50萬億元,數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)占GDP比重達(dá)41.5%,位居世界第二位??梢姡瑪?shù)據(jù)已經(jīng)具備與其他生產(chǎn)要素相同的關(guān)鍵地位,其不僅與實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)深度契合,甚至成為我國重要的基礎(chǔ)性戰(zhàn)略資源。然而,少數(shù)超級(jí)平臺(tái)壟斷了大量數(shù)據(jù)資源,借助所謂的“上帝視角”,能夠獲取精準(zhǔn)的市場(chǎng)情報(bào),從而在市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中占據(jù)有利地位,實(shí)現(xiàn)跨界競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。超級(jí)平臺(tái)的數(shù)據(jù)壟斷不僅破壞了市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的公平性,還因?qū)?shù)據(jù)共享結(jié)構(gòu)的異變與破壞,最終弱化了其公共資源價(jià)值的實(shí)現(xiàn)。目前,我國學(xué)界對(duì)于平臺(tái)利用數(shù)據(jù)壟斷地位可能破壞市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)環(huán)境,阻礙數(shù)據(jù)共享,危害消費(fèi)者權(quán)益已形成共識(shí)[1]。數(shù)據(jù)壟斷行為對(duì)基于工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的反壟斷法帶來基礎(chǔ)理論和規(guī)制體系的挑戰(zhàn),不同學(xué)者從平臺(tái)義務(wù)[2]、監(jiān)管幅度[3]、監(jiān)管方式[4]、監(jiān)管手段[5]等角度分析數(shù)據(jù)壟斷行為的規(guī)制。但目前研究呈現(xiàn)“重監(jiān)管輕合規(guī)”的現(xiàn)象?;诖耍疚耐ㄟ^對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)壟斷危害進(jìn)行檢視,探究數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)的理論依據(jù)和現(xiàn)實(shí)困境,并試圖從規(guī)章制定、數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)屬明晰和合規(guī)監(jiān)管三個(gè)方面形塑可行的因應(yīng)對(duì)策,以期對(duì)促進(jìn)平臺(tái)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)合規(guī)有所裨益。


本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:

http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000006093


作者信息:

陳鏡霖

(西南民族大學(xué)法學(xué)院,四川成都610041)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。