《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 設(shè)計應(yīng)用 > 數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)下平臺數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)的理據(jù)與路徑
數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)下平臺數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)的理據(jù)與路徑
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理
陳鏡霖
西南民族大學(xué)法學(xué)院
摘要: 數(shù)據(jù)要素的非競爭性、非排他性因平臺壟斷意圖逐漸異化,并誘發(fā)算法共謀、大數(shù)據(jù)殺熟、平臺扼殺式并購等反競爭行為。基于維護(hù)數(shù)據(jù)市場交易秩序的現(xiàn)實需要、競爭倡導(dǎo)理論的法理支撐以及域外數(shù)據(jù)合規(guī)監(jiān)管的經(jīng)驗參考,平臺數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)具有適用的可行性與必要性。然而,平臺數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)往往因頂層規(guī)范缺失、規(guī)則模糊以及監(jiān)管機(jī)制弱化等無法實現(xiàn)預(yù)期效果。對此,應(yīng)細(xì)化“數(shù)據(jù)反壟斷合規(guī)指南”的設(shè)計邏輯指引合規(guī),區(qū)分不同類型數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)屬以明確數(shù)據(jù)流通規(guī)則,依據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)流通的不同環(huán)節(jié)形塑數(shù)據(jù)競爭合規(guī)評價標(biāo)準(zhǔn),銜接事前監(jiān)管與事后監(jiān)管理念促進(jìn)監(jiān)管理念革新,并依托人工智能算法技術(shù)賦能監(jiān)管方式轉(zhuǎn)型。
中圖分類號:D922.294;D922.1文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.07.010
引用格式:陳鏡霖.數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)下平臺數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)的理據(jù)與路徑[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2024,43(7):61-68.
The rationale and path of platform data monopoly compliance under the digital economy
Chen Jinglin
Law School, Southwest Minzu University
Abstract: The noncompetitive and non-exclusive nature of data elements is gradually alienated by the platform′s monopoly intention, and induces anti-competitive behaviours such as algorithmic conspiracy, big data kills maturity, and platform strangulation mergers and acquisitions. Based on the practical need to maintain the order of data market transactions, the jurisprudential support of competition advocacy theory, and the empirical reference of extraterritorial data compliance regulation, the platform data monopoly compliance has the feasibility and necessity of application. However, data monopoly compliance often fails to achieve the expected results due to the lack of top-level norms, vague rules and weak regulatory mechanisms. In this regard, the design logic of the Data Antitrust Compliance Guidelines should be refined to guide compliance, differentiate the ownership of different types of data in order to clarify the rules of data circulation, shape the evaluation criteria of data competition compliance based on different aspects of data circulation, connect the concepts of ex ante and ex post regulation to promote the innovation of regulatory concepts, and rely on the algorithmic technology of AI to empower the transformation of regulatory methods.
Key words : digital economy; platform data; monopoly compliance; data circulation; data ownership

引言

數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時代,數(shù)據(jù)已成為全球競爭的關(guān)鍵要素?!稊?shù)字中國發(fā)展報告(2022)》顯示,2022年我國數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模已超過50萬億元,數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)占GDP比重達(dá)41.5%,位居世界第二位。可見,數(shù)據(jù)已經(jīng)具備與其他生產(chǎn)要素相同的關(guān)鍵地位,其不僅與實體經(jīng)濟(jì)深度契合,甚至成為我國重要的基礎(chǔ)性戰(zhàn)略資源。然而,少數(shù)超級平臺壟斷了大量數(shù)據(jù)資源,借助所謂的“上帝視角”,能夠獲取精準(zhǔn)的市場情報,從而在市場競爭中占據(jù)有利地位,實現(xiàn)跨界競爭。超級平臺的數(shù)據(jù)壟斷不僅破壞了市場競爭的公平性,還因?qū)?shù)據(jù)共享結(jié)構(gòu)的異變與破壞,最終弱化了其公共資源價值的實現(xiàn)。目前,我國學(xué)界對于平臺利用數(shù)據(jù)壟斷地位可能破壞市場競爭環(huán)境,阻礙數(shù)據(jù)共享,危害消費者權(quán)益已形成共識[1]。數(shù)據(jù)壟斷行為對基于工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的反壟斷法帶來基礎(chǔ)理論和規(guī)制體系的挑戰(zhàn),不同學(xué)者從平臺義務(wù)[2]、監(jiān)管幅度[3]、監(jiān)管方式[4]、監(jiān)管手段[5]等角度分析數(shù)據(jù)壟斷行為的規(guī)制。但目前研究呈現(xiàn)“重監(jiān)管輕合規(guī)”的現(xiàn)象?;诖?,本文通過對數(shù)據(jù)壟斷危害進(jìn)行檢視,探究數(shù)據(jù)壟斷合規(guī)的理論依據(jù)和現(xiàn)實困境,并試圖從規(guī)章制定、數(shù)據(jù)權(quán)屬明晰和合規(guī)監(jiān)管三個方面形塑可行的因應(yīng)對策,以期對促進(jìn)平臺企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)合規(guī)有所裨益。


本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請下載:

http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000006093


作者信息:

陳鏡霖

(西南民族大學(xué)法學(xué)院,四川成都610041)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。