《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁(yè) > 其他 > 设计应用 > 论数字化“智力成果”保护向著作权法回归的正当性——以人工智能生成内容的保护路径选择为例
论数字化“智力成果”保护向著作权法回归的正当性——以人工智能生成内容的保护路径选择为例
网络安全与数据治理
徐榕岭
上海大学法学院
摘要: 现阶段数字化“智力成果”不断涌现,但著作权保护之正当性却遭遇了前所未有的挑战。以人工智能生成内容为例,无论是在保护对象上、权利主体上还是受控行为上都因为技术的强势介入而产生认定难题,进而产生了适用反不正当竞争法进行保护的倾向。但事实上,适用反不正当竞争法不仅无法达到预期效果,反而会因抵触著作权法而增加社会成本。经过进一步分析,可以发现人工智能生成内容等数字化“智力成果”之上存在创作模式、技术身份和使用行为性质的认识误区。当相关误区被纠正后,著作权法完全有能力对数字化“智力成果”提供充分保护并且实现作者利益与公众利益之间的平衡。因此,正确的做法是在外部明确著作权法、反不正当竞争法和公共领域的界限,在内部利用著作权法高效的利益平衡机制寻找适合数字化“智力成果”的保护模式。
中圖分類號(hào):D923.41文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.04.013
引用格式:徐榕嶺.論數(shù)字化“智力成果”保護(hù)向著作權(quán)法回歸的正當(dāng)性——以人工智能生成內(nèi)容的保護(hù)路徑選擇為例[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2024,43(4):77-84.
The legitimacy of reverting digital "intellectual achievements" protection to copyright law——Background on the path selection for protecting AI-generated content
Xu Rongling
Law School, Shanghai University
Abstract: At present, a plethora of digital "intellectual achievements" continue to emerge, but the legitimacy of copyright protection has been challenged as never before. Taking AI-generated content as an example, both in the object of protection, the subject of rights, and the controlled behavior, there are difficulties in identifying because of the strong involvement of technology, which leads to the tendency of applying anti-unfair competition law for protection. However, the application of anti-unfair competition law not only fails to achieve the desired effect, but also increases social costs due to the conflict with copyright law. After further analysis, it can be found that there are misunderstandings about the creation mode, technical identity, and the nature of use behavior on digital "intellectual achievements" such as AI-generated content. When the relevant misunderstandings are corrected, copyright law is fully capable of providing adequate protection for digital "intellectual achievements" and achieving a balance between the interests of authors and the public interest. Therefore, the correct approach is to clearly define the boundaries of copyright law, anti-unfair competition law and public domain externally, and to find a protection mode suitable for digital "intellectual achievements" internally by using the efficient interest balance mechanism of copyright law.
Key words : copyright protection; unfair competition; AI-generated content; work; application relationship

引言

進(jìn)入數(shù)字經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代后,新型數(shù)字化“智力成果”不斷涌現(xiàn),此類“智力成果”之上的使用行為也隨之更新。保護(hù)對(duì)象[1]與使用方式的創(chuàng)新是產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型的必然結(jié)果,但也對(duì)著作權(quán)法獨(dú)立適用形成挑戰(zhàn)。目前看來(lái),產(chǎn)業(yè)數(shù)字化帶來(lái)的挑戰(zhàn)并沒有被妥善解決,司法實(shí)踐中大量本應(yīng)由著作權(quán)法加以保護(hù)的“智力成果”逐漸被反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法(以下簡(jiǎn)稱“反法”)所吸收,對(duì)著作權(quán)法的獨(dú)立保護(hù)構(gòu)成阻礙。其中一個(gè)典型是人工智能生成內(nèi)容(以下簡(jiǎn)稱“AI生成內(nèi)容”),因著作權(quán)法上AI生成內(nèi)容是否構(gòu)成作品、歸屬于誰(shuí)以及某些使用行為受控與否都存在較大爭(zhēng)議。盡管現(xiàn)階段司法實(shí)踐基本還是將AI生成內(nèi)容置于著作權(quán)法之下作保護(hù)與否的評(píng)價(jià),但權(quán)利人于“Dreamwriter生成作品”案中率先提出適用反法進(jìn)行保護(hù)的要求,并且此種觀點(diǎn)在學(xué)界也受到一定支持[2],甚至有觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為AI生成內(nèi)容應(yīng)當(dāng)作為物的孳息歸屬于人工智能硬件所有人[3]。其他法律規(guī)范的介入,極有可能使得AI生成內(nèi)容成為下一個(gè)因適用關(guān)系不清而產(chǎn)生保護(hù)程度差異的客體。


本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:

http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000005973


作者信息:

徐榕嶺

(上海大學(xué)法學(xué)院,上海200444)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。