《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 設(shè)計應(yīng)用 > 異步審理模式的訴訟效率分析
異步審理模式的訴訟效率分析
——基于杭州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院的實證研究
網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理 2023年3期
王立源
(中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院,北京100098)
摘要: 異步審理模式基于其在時間和空間上的“非同步”性與堅持“直接言詞原則”的傳統(tǒng)訴訟模式形成了鮮明對比。關(guān)于異步審理模式對訴訟效率的影響問題,使用最小二乘法和傾向得分匹配法實證分析了杭州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院5 714份裁判文書,得出以下結(jié)論:首先,采用異步審理模式的案件相較于非異步審理的案件顯著提高了158%的訴訟效率?;诟咝c便捷兩種優(yōu)勢,異步審理模式對于當(dāng)事人接近正義具有積極作用。其次,異步審理模式對于不同案件類型的訴訟效率具有異質(zhì)性?,F(xiàn)階段,異步審理司法實踐更多適用于以銀行為主體的借款糾紛。為更好發(fā)揮異步審理模式的制度功能,一方面應(yīng)當(dāng)明確異步審理模式的適用群體為弱勢自然人群體并加強其認(rèn)知度;另一方面,在訴訟標(biāo)的額上限定適用異步審理模式的案件范圍,突出異步審理模式的非普適性,以減少異步審理模式對于民事訴訟程序正義價值的沖擊。
中圖分類號:D92
文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼:A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.03.008
引用格式:王立源.異步審理模式的訴訟效率分析——基于杭州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院的實證研究[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2023,42(3):46-52,57.
Ananalysis of the lawsuit efficiency of asynchronous trial pattern: an empirical study based on Hangzhou Internet court
Wei Xinquan
(School of Law, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100098,China)
Abstract: The asynchronous trialpattern, based on its “non synchronization” in time and space, is in sharp contrast to the traditional lawsuit pattern that adheres to the “direct verbal principle”. On the impact of asynchronous trial pattern on lawsuit efficiency, an empirical analysis using the least square method and propensity score matching method was conducted on 5 714 adjudication documents of the Hangzhou Internet Court. Firstly, cases using asynchronous trial pattern significantly improved lawsuit efficiency by 158% compared to non asynchronous trial cases. Based on the advantages of efficiency and convenience, the asynchronous trial pattern has a positive effect on the parties′ access to justice. Secondly, the asynchronous trial pattern has heterogeneity in the lawsuit efficiency of different case types. At this stage, the judicial practice of asynchronous trial is more applicable to loan disputes dominated by banks. To better leverage the institutional function of the asynchronous trial pattern, on the one hand, it should be clear that the applicable group of the asynchronous trial pattern is the vulnerable natural person group and strengthen its awareness; on the other hand, it should limit the scope of cases applicable to the asynchronous trial pattern in terms of the amount of litigation object, and highlight the non universality of the asynchronous trial pattern to reduce the impact of the asynchronous trial pattern on the justice value of civil procedure.
Key words : asynchronous trial; Internet courts;summary procedures; access to justice; the Principle of Directness and Verbalism

0    引言

在移動互聯(lián)技術(shù)日新月異的當(dāng)下,我國法院系統(tǒng)積極適應(yīng)信息時代的發(fā)展趨勢,特別是順應(yīng)“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”趨勢而設(shè)立的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院,更是擔(dān)當(dāng)了探尋技術(shù)革新背景下在線訴訟制度設(shè)計的“試驗田”的角色。在此過程中,杭州、北京、廣州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院各自出臺了相應(yīng)的具有試點性質(zhì)的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)在線訴訟規(guī)則,其中有關(guān)異步審理(又稱非同步審理)這一新型訴訟審理模式的規(guī)定引起了民事訴訟法學(xué)界的關(guān)注。非同步審理模式在2018年4月2日首次上線于杭州互聯(lián)網(wǎng)法院,后續(xù)被《人民法院在線訴訟規(guī)則》吸收完善。2021年6月17日,最高人民法院發(fā)布《人民法院在線訴訟規(guī)則》,正式明確了異步審理模式的機制效力及適用條件。異步審理是將原來需要各方訴訟主體在同一時空共同完成的訴訟活動,由各方訴訟主體依托訴訟平臺,在一定時間范圍內(nèi)分別完成并統(tǒng)一匯集至訴訟平臺,利用信息技術(shù)可記錄留痕、可查詢追溯的特點,打破時空限制,提供訴訟便利。




本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請下載:http://ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000005255




作者信息:

王立源

(中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院,北京100098)


微信圖片_20210517164139.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。